This lawsuit should make sellers think twice before selling their products and claiming them to be %100 when they actually aren’t.
I’m actually cringing. Could someone please take the woman and the lawyer and shoot them for me. No, just the lawyer for being a money hungry bastard, though I’m sure the woman is suffering extreme irreperrable mental harm due to the damage caused to her taste buds because of the lack of fruit in the jam.
Seriously, reading this reminded me of a discussion I had with a friend of mine. Lawsuits like these, they make us look bad. What harm did she suffer? Did the jam make her ill? Send her to the hospital? No. If she was so displeased she could have taken the jar back and asked for a refund.
Now there’s going to be this DTPA action because she has sensitive taste buds, and the point is, to sue over something silly like this only goes to show that there are some really lousy lawyers out there who do not deserve to have a license. Not when they’re bringing frivolous actions like this one. Not when there are lawsuits out there making a mockery of the very same judicial system.