{"id":2287,"date":"2004-05-14T21:11:38","date_gmt":"2004-05-14T21:11:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nimsay.blackglass.org\/2004\/05\/14\/supreme-court-denies-stay\/"},"modified":"2004-05-14T21:11:38","modified_gmt":"2004-05-14T21:11:38","slug":"supreme-court-denies-stay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/?p=2287","title":{"rendered":"supreme-court-denies-stay"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the first homosexual couples will be officially and legally married, and no one in that state can stop them thanks to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to refuse <a href=\"\/%22http:\/\/msnbc.msn.com\/id\/4981648\/%22\">to block the marriages<\/a>.<br \/>\nThe Court did not issue a comment, which in laymens&#8217; terms means that they take no position on the case either way.  The matter will be taken up by the Court of Appeals in June.  Scalia did gripe, but I&#8217;d be surprised if he didn&#8217;t.<br \/>\nShould the Ct. of Appeals even grant a stay in the near future this is at least some kind of progress though it does or may place the court in a situation where it will have to decide whether marriage is a fundamental right between a man and a woman, or is it gender neutral.  Either way, there&#8217;s a fight in the federal system now, and I can only hope that our judges are sensible enough to look past their religious biases and can recognize that these are human beings that we&#8217;re dealing with.  People who are entitled to the same protections as heterosexual couples.<br \/>\nPardon me, but I just don&#8217;t get the whole &#8216;it&#8217;s against god, against nature&#8217; crap.  If judges take issue with this, then they have no business being on the bench appointed or otherwise.  Granted I have no control over this but that&#8217;s just my two cents.  \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the first homosexual couples will be officially and legally married, and no one in that state can stop them thanks to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to refuse to block the marriages. The Court did not issue a comment, which in laymens&#8217; terms means that they take no position on the case either way. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blackglass.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}